Professional PV Connector Manufacturer
TÜV Rheinland · UL · CE · RoHS — Product-Specific Certification & Compliance | info@treasol.com
GLOSSARY

PV Connector and Solar Cable Glossary

34 terms that decide whether a photovoltaic DC connection is built correctly — each given one citable definition, then the detail that matters when the term turns up in a specification, a datasheet or a failure report.

Connector standards — IEC 62852, UL 6703, TÜV 2 PfG 2740
Cable standards — EN 50618, H1Z2Z2-K, PV1-F, UL 4703
Installation codes — IEC 62548-1, NEC 690.33(C)
Performance & failure — contact resistance, cross-mating, IP68, hot spots

How to read these definitions

  • The bold sentence is the definition — one statement, self-contained, safe to quote.
  • The paragraph below it is what the term changes in practice.
  • See also links to the terms that are usually confused with it.

Where a figure is a commonly used acceptance criterion rather than a value fixed by a standard, the text says so.

Connector product standards

The documents a PV DC connector is qualified against, and what each one does and does not establish.

IEC 62852 IEC 62852

The international product standard for connectors used in the DC circuits of photovoltaic systems: it sets the safety requirements and the type tests a connector must pass, qualifying a product rather than a mating combination.

IEC 62852 defines what a PV DC connector must withstand — temperature rise at rated current, dry heat, damp heat, thermal cycling, pull-out force, ingress protection and protection against electric shock. A connector holding a current certificate to this standard has been assessed as a product. It does not follow that the connector may be mated with another manufacturer's product; that question belongs to the installation codes. Editions and national adoptions vary, so the edition in force in the project's jurisdiction governs.

See also: EN 62852UL 6703Cross-mating (intermateability)

EN 62852 EN 62852

The European adoption of IEC 62852, published by CENELEC; a connector certified to it has been assessed against the same technical content as IEC 62852.

EN 62852 mirrors the international standard at European level. A European project will usually see EN 62852 named on the certificate, while markets that adopt IEC directly cite IEC 62852. Because the two share technical content a certificate to one is normally accepted as evidence for the other, but the document actually named in the project specification is the one that should appear on the certificate. Check the edition, not just the number.

See also: IEC 62852EN 50521

EN 50521 EN 50521

The European connector standard that EN 62852 superseded; it still appears on older certificates and in legacy project specifications.

EN 50521 was the earlier European standard for PV DC connectors and has been withdrawn in favour of EN 62852. It is encountered on installations built before the changeover, and a specification written some years ago may still name it. That does not make the product defective, but a specification issued today should reference EN 62852 or IEC 62852. Where a tender still names EN 50521, establish which edition applies and which successor standard the supplier's certificate actually cites.

See also: EN 62852IEC 62852

UL 6703 UL 6703

The North American standard for connectors for use in photovoltaic systems, recognized in the United States and Canada.

UL 6703 is the standard against which PV connectors are investigated for the North American market, alongside the installation requirements of the National Electrical Code. A listing is a product certification identified by a file number that can be looked up in UL's public database, so the file number, the standard and the edition should all appear on the document a supplier provides. Like every product standard, UL 6703 does not by itself authorise mating a connector with a different manufacturer's product.

See also: IEC 62852NEC 690.33(C)

TÜV 2 PfG 2740 2 PfG 2740

A TÜV Rheinland component specification applied to photovoltaic connectors, used alongside the international product standard rather than instead of it.

The 2 PfG series covers components, and 2 PfG 2740 is the specification TÜV Rheinland applies to PV connectors. Certificates referencing it are common on European datasheets. It sits alongside IEC 62852 or EN 62852: the international product standard defines the test regime, and the TÜV specification defines what TÜV additionally requires before issuing its own certificate. When a datasheet cites a 2 PfG number, ask for the certificate number so the claim can be checked in the issuing body's database.

See also: IEC 62852TÜV 2 PfG 1169

IEC 63678 IEC 63678

A standard for a standardised plug-and-socket design for DC photovoltaic systems, in development since 2023 and not yet published as a design basis.

The intention behind IEC 63678 is a single standardised connector geometry for PV DC systems, so that connectors from different manufacturers are intermateable by design rather than by each brand's approved mating list. It has been in development since 2023 and is not yet published as a basis for product design or for a compatibility claim, so no product should currently assert conformity to it. Until it is published, intermateability continues to be governed by the installation codes.

See also: Cross-mating (intermateability)NEC 690.33(C)

MC4 MC4

A registered trademark of Stäubli, formerly Multi-Contact, for a single-contact DC connector with a 4 mm contact diameter — widely used as though it were a generic name for the PV connector format it established.

MC4 is a trademark, not a standard and not a generic part description. The name is commonly applied to any PV DC connector, which is why 'MC4 compatible' needs reading carefully: it means the product is designed to mate with that connector format, not that it is made by Stäubli or interchangeable with every connector sold under the name. Certification applies to each product on its own. Where a specification requires MC4, establish whether it means the Stäubli part or the format — these are different requirements.

See also: Cross-mating (intermateability)IEC 62852

Cable standards and designations

The cable standards behind the designations printed on a datasheet, and the difference between them.

EN 50618 EN 50618

The European standard for electric cables for photovoltaic systems, and the source of the H1Z2Z2-K designation.

EN 50618 covers the flexible, cross-linked, halogen-free single-core cables used on the DC side of photovoltaic installations. It sets the conductor class, the insulation and sheath compounds, and the endurance tests that matter in this application: ozone resistance, ultraviolet resistance, cold bending and resistance to the temperature cycling a cable sees on a roof or across a field. The H1Z2Z2-K designation under this standard is rated 1.0/1.0 kV AC and 1.5 kV DC. IEC 62930 is the international counterpart.

See also: H1Z2Z2-KIEC 62930PV1-F

H1Z2Z2-K H1Z2Z2-K

The designation given by EN 50618 to the cross-linked, halogen-free, single-core DC cable used on the photovoltaic side of an installation, rated 1.0/1.0 kV AC and 1.5 kV DC.

The code is a harmonised designation, and each element carries meaning: H for the harmonised European cable type, a voltage band, Z2 for cross-linked halogen-free insulation, Z2 again for the matching sheath, and K for the flexible conductor class. H1Z2Z2-K is rated 1.0/1.0 kV AC and 1.5 kV DC. It must not be confused with PV1-F, which is a different designation assessed under TÜV 2 PfG 1169 and rated 1.8 kV DC. Pairing one designation with the other's voltage is a common and easily spotted datasheet error.

See also: EN 50618PV1-FIEC 60228

IEC 62930 IEC 62930

The international standard for electric cables for photovoltaic systems, the IEC counterpart of EN 50618.

IEC 62930 describes the same class of cable as EN 50618: cross-linked, halogen-free, single-core, with a flexible tinned-copper conductor, intended for the DC circuits of photovoltaic systems. It exists so that markets adopting IEC standards directly have an international reference for PV cable rather than relying on the European document. In practice a supplier holds one certificate or the other, or both, and the project specification decides which is required. As with connectors, the edition named on the certificate is part of the claim.

See also: EN 50618UL 4703

UL 4703 UL 4703

The North American standard behind the PV Wire designation used on the DC side of installations in the United States and Canada.

PV Wire is evaluated for sunlight resistance, wet and dry conditions and higher temperature ratings than the general-purpose building wire it replaces on a PV array, because the DC conductors are exposed and operate in conditions ordinary wire is not tested for. The listing for a given construction is identified by a UL file number. UL 4703 is a cable standard only: it says nothing about the connector crimped onto the cable, and a harness assembly is qualified by the connector's standard as well.

See also: IEC 62930Pull-out force (crimp tensile strength)

PV1-F PV1-F

A photovoltaic cable designation assessed under the TÜV Rheinland specification 2 PfG 1169 and rated 0.6/1.0 kV AC and 1.8 kV DC.

PV1-F is the older of the two PV cable designations seen in Europe and remains in widespread use. It is a different product from H1Z2Z2-K, not a synonym for it: PV1-F is assessed under TÜV 2 PfG 1169 and carries a 1.8 kV DC rating, while H1Z2Z2-K is assessed under EN 50618 at 1.5 kV DC. Both describe cross-linked, halogen-free PV cable with tinned copper conductors, and both are available in the Treasol PV cable range. Each must be stated with its own voltage.

See also: TÜV 2 PfG 1169H1Z2Z2-KEN 50618

TÜV 2 PfG 1169 2 PfG 1169

The TÜV Rheinland component specification under which the PV1-F photovoltaic cable designation is assessed.

TÜV 2 PfG 1169 is the specification in the TÜV Rheinland 2 PfG series associated with PV1-F cable, defining the tests TÜV applies when it issues a certificate for a cable of that type. It is a separate route to third-party evidence rather than a substitute for EN 50618 or IEC 62930, and a cable certified under it is rated to 1.8 kV DC. Where a project requires EN 50618, a 2 PfG 1169 certificate does not satisfy it — and the reverse also holds.

See also: PV1-FTÜV 2 PfG 2740

IEC 60228 IEC 60228

The international standard defining classes of insulated cable conductors; photovoltaic DC cable uses class 5 flexible conductors.

IEC 60228 defines conductor classes by the flexibility of the stranding, from class 1 solid through to class 6, where class 5 is flexible and class 6 the most flexible. PV DC cable is built on class 5 conductors. This matters in practice for two reasons: a crimped joint to a flexible conductor behaves differently from one to a solid or a stranded class 2 conductor, and it is why connector contacts are specified with a conductor class and a cross-section range rather than a single size. A contact approved for class 5 is not automatically approved for a class 6 or class 2 conductor of the same area.

See also: CrimpingH1Z2Z2-K

Installation codes

The codes that govern what an installation may do with a certified product — including whether two connectors may be mated.

IEC 62548-1 IEC 62548-1

The international installation standard giving design requirements for photovoltaic arrays, including the requirement that mated connectors be compatible.

IEC 62548-1 sets out design requirements for the DC side of a photovoltaic array: string configuration, protection, isolation and the requirements placed on the components making up the array. On connectors, this is the installation standard that carries the compatibility requirement — the product standard IEC 62852 establishes what a connector must be, and this one establishes what an installation may do with it. It is used alongside IEC 60364-7-712 for the installation as a whole. As with all installation codes, the locally applicable edition governs.

See also: IEC 62852IEC 60364-7-712Cross-mating (intermateability)

IEC 60364-7-712 IEC 60364-7-712

The part of the IEC 60364 low-voltage installation series that covers photovoltaic power supply systems.

This is the photovoltaic section of the international low-voltage installation standard. It covers how a PV power supply system is integrated into a building or site installation: protection against electric shock on the DC side, earthing and equipotential bonding, isolation and switching, and the safety consequences of an array that cannot be switched off at source. It applies to the installation rather than to individual products. A connector certified to IEC 62852 is used in an installation designed to this standard; the two answer different questions.

See also: IEC 62548-1NEC Article 690

NEC Article 690 NEC 690

Article 690 of the National Electrical Code, covering solar photovoltaic systems in the United States, including the connector interconnection requirement at 690.33(C).

Article 690 governs photovoltaic systems in the National Electrical Code, addressing circuit sizing, overcurrent protection, disconnection, grounding and labelling. It is written to be enforced by inspection rather than read as guidance. The Code is updated on a three-year cycle, and the edition adopted by the local authority having jurisdiction is the one that applies to a project — not necessarily the most recent published edition. The provisions specifically addressing connectors sit in 690.33, and the requirement that matters most is 690.33(C).

See also: NEC 690.33(C)NEC 690.7UL 6703

NEC 690.33(C) NEC 690.33(C)

The National Electrical Code provision requiring mated photovoltaic connectors to be of the same type from the same manufacturer, or listed and identified as intermateable.

This is the clearest statement of the cross-mating rule in any code. It requires that where connectors interconnect the DC circuits of a PV system, the mating connectors be the same type from the same manufacturer, or be listed and identified as intermateable with each other. It is the reason mixing brands on a string is not merely a warranty question in the United States but a code-compliance question. A connector individually listed to UL 6703 does not by itself satisfy the provision when mated with another manufacturer's product.

See also: Cross-mating (intermateability)NEC Article 690UL 6703

NEC 690.7 NEC 690.7

The National Electrical Code provision for calculating maximum photovoltaic system voltage, accounting for the rise in open-circuit voltage as cell temperature falls.

NEC 690.7 sets out how the maximum voltage of a PV system is determined for the purpose of selecting equipment. The essential point is that a module's open-circuit voltage rises as its cells get colder, so a system designed against the module's rated open-circuit voltage will exceed the equipment's voltage rating on a cold morning. The calculation applies a temperature correction at the lowest expected cell temperature. This is the practical constraint behind 1500 V DC systems: the component's rated voltage is the ceiling, and the corrected cold-weather voltage has to stay beneath it.

See also: 1500 V DC ratingNEC Article 690

Electrical performance

The quantities that decide whether a joint stays cool for twenty-five years or becomes a fault.

Contact resistance

The electrical resistance of the joint between two mated contacts, measured in milliohms by the four-wire Kelvin method.

Contact resistance is the resistance where the two contact surfaces touch, and it determines how much heat the joint produces, because the power dissipated follows P = I²R: at 30 A a contact resistance of 0.5 mΩ dissipates roughly 0.45 W in a volume the size of a pin. A criterion below 0.5 mΩ is commonly used in qualification testing, measured by the four-wire Kelvin method, which keeps the resistance of the test leads out of the reading. Contact resistance rises with corrosion, contamination and loss of contact force, which is how a connector passes a type test and still overheats years later.

See also: I²R heating at the jointCrimpingThermal cycling

Ampacity derating

The reduction applied to a cable's or connector's rated current to account for a particular installation, principally ambient temperature and bundling.

A current rating is stated for a defined set of conditions. When the real installation departs from them the rating has to be reduced, and the two corrections that matter most on a PV array are ambient temperature and bundling. A cable rated for a 90 °C conductor has less headroom in a 70 °C ambient than the headline figure suggests, and cables routed together in a conduit or a harness cannot each carry their individual free-air rating, because they heat one another. Connectors are derated on the same principle, so a design's current is checked against the derated value rather than the catalogue figure.

See also: I²R heating at the jointContact resistance

I²R heating at the joint

The heat produced at an electrical joint by the current passing through its resistance, proportional to the square of the current.

The power dissipated in a resistance is P = I²R, so at a connector contact the heat generated rises with the square of the string current: doubling the current quadruples the heating. This is why a marginal contact resistance is tolerable on a small installation and hazardous on a large one, and why the current rating is a property of the joint rather than of the housing. The heat has nowhere to go but into the contact and the surrounding insulation, and sustained heating is the mechanism by which a degraded joint progresses towards failure.

See also: Contact resistanceHot spot (at a connection)Ampacity derating

IP code (degree of protection) IEC 60529

The two-digit classification defined by IEC 60529 for the protection an enclosure provides against the ingress of solid objects and of water.

The first digit covers solid particle protection, from 0 for none to 6 for dust-tight; the second covers water, from 0 to 8. A PV connector is typically rated IP65, IP67 or IP68 in its mated state. The rating describes the assembly as tested — a mated, correctly locked pair — and says nothing about the connector when unmated or partially engaged, which is when water actually enters most field failures. It is also independent of electrical performance: an IP68 connector can still have a high contact resistance.

See also: IP68Water ingress

IP68 IP68

The highest water-protection class in IEC 60529: dust-tight and protected against continuous immersion in water under conditions agreed between manufacturer and user.

IP68 is the rating most often quoted on PV connectors. Under IEC 60529 it means dust-tight and protected against continuous immersion, with the depth and duration of that immersion agreed between the manufacturer and the purchaser rather than fixed by the standard — so two IP68 products need not have been tested to identical conditions. IP67, the class below, is defined as protection against temporary immersion, conventionally 1 m for 30 minutes. Both apply to the connector in its mated, correctly locked state.

See also: IP code (degree of protection)Water ingress

1500 V DC rating

The maximum system voltage a PV connector or cable is certified to carry on the DC side, and the ceiling against which a string's corrected cold-weather voltage is checked.

PV DC components are commonly rated 1500 V DC, with 1000 V DC the older class for installations built before the higher rating became normal. The figure is a certification limit rather than a comfortable operating point: the string's maximum voltage, calculated with the low-temperature correction described in NEC 690.7 or the equivalent local requirement, must stay at or below it. A 1500 V rated connector on a string whose corrected voltage reaches 1520 V on a cold morning is outside its certification, and the product standard does not cover the outcome.

See also: NEC 690.7IEC 62852

Connection and assembly practice

What happens on site when the connector is actually fitted to the cable.

Cross-mating (intermateability)

Mating a connector with one from a different manufacturer, or with a different product in the same manufacturer's range, outside a tested and approved combination.

Certification applies to a product, not to a combination of products: two connectors each certified to IEC 62852 have been assessed separately, and nothing in the standard establishes that the pair performs as tested. NEC 690.33(C) is the strictest treatment of this, requiring mated connectors to be the same type from the same manufacturer or listed and identified as intermateable. Even where the interface fits, tolerances in contact geometry, locking and sealing differ between manufacturers. The same rule applies within one brand's range, where a change of model number can be a change of mating specification.

See also: NEC 690.33(C)IEC 63678Positive locking

Crimping

Joining a cable conductor to a contact by mechanically deforming the contact around the conductor to form a cold weld between the metals.

Crimping is neither soldering nor clamping: a correctly made crimp forms a metallurgical bond between the conductor strands and the barrel of the contact. The quality of the joint depends on three things matching — the contact, the die in the crimping tool, and the conductor size and class. Change any one and the joint is outside the tested combination, which is why the specification for a PV connector names the supported conductor sizes together with the corresponding die. A crimp that looks acceptable can still be electrically poor; the evidence is in the pull-out force and in a cross-section.

See also: Pull-out force (crimp tensile strength)IEC 60228Contact resistance

Pull-out force (crimp tensile strength)

The axial load a completed crimped joint withstands before the conductor pulls out, used as the acceptance test for crimp quality.

Pull-out force is the standard test of whether a crimp was made correctly. The joint is pulled axially to a specified minimum or to destruction and the result compared against the value the contact is rated for. It catches the failure modes visual inspection misses: a die that is worn or mismatched to the conductor, a contact closed on the insulation instead of the conductor, or an incorrect insertion depth. Because the test is destructive, production verification is by sample and by process control rather than on every joint, which is why the tool and die combination is part of the product specification.

See also: CrimpingStrain relief

Positive locking

The mechanical feature that holds a mated connector pair engaged and requires a deliberate action to separate it.

A PV connector's locking mechanism carries the sealing system and maintains contact force; if the pair separates, both are lost. IEC 62852 requires connectors to remain engaged under defined conditions, and the locking feature is what satisfies that requirement. In practice, locking failures come from the same sources as contact failures: contamination, damage from a tool, or a housing that was never fully engaged during assembly and merely looked closed. The audible and tactile click of a correctly engaged pair is the diagnostic the standards rely on indirectly — a connector that will not click is not engaged, whatever it looks like.

See also: Cross-mating (intermateability)Strain relief

Strain relief

The feature that prevents mechanical load on a cable from being transmitted to the electrical connection inside a connector.

Strain relief stops a cable being pulled, flexed or vibrated by wind from working the crimp and the contact interface loose. In a PV connector it is provided by the cable gland or boot that grips the cable sheath, and the fit between that grip and the cable's outer diameter is part of the connector's specification: a gland rated for 5 to 8 mm will not grip a 6 mm cable of a different sheath compound in the same way. Field failures attributed to the connector are frequently a cable that was poorly supported on the array, with the load arriving at the connection the gland was meant to protect.

See also: CrimpingPull-out force (crimp tensile strength)

Reliability and failure modes

How a connection that passed its type test still fails in year eight, and how to recognise it.

Thermal cycling

The repeated heating and cooling of a connection as current and ambient temperature vary, and the fatigue it causes in the contact interface.

A connector on a PV string sees a daily thermal cycle: current in daylight, ambient swings of tens of degrees, and a temperature rise at the contact itself that follows the square of the current. Each cycle is a small expansion and contraction of metal parts that must stay in contact, and thermal cycling is a standard endurance test in IEC 62852. It is also the mechanism by which a joint that passed its type test degrades: contact force relaxes, resistance creeps up, and the heat generated rises with it. The feedback is slow, which is why connection failures appear in year eight rather than at commissioning.

See also: Contact resistanceHot spot (at a connection)I²R heating at the joint

Water ingress

The entry of moisture into a connector past its sealing system — the most common initiating cause of contact corrosion on a PV array.

Water reaching the contact is usually the first step in a failure that presents years later as overheating. Once moisture is present at the interface the contact metals corrode, corrosion products raise the contact resistance, and the raised resistance generates heat, which accelerates the corrosion still further. Ingress rarely comes through the sealed interface itself. More often it comes from a connector left unmated or only partly engaged, a damaged seal, a gland that does not match the cable sheath diameter, or a wetted cable routing water into the housing by capillary action.

See also: IP68Contact corrosionIP code (degree of protection)

Contact corrosion

Degradation of the contact surfaces of a connector by electrochemical action in the presence of moisture and a potential difference.

Two dissimilar metals in contact with an electrolyte form a galvanic cell, and the more active metal corrodes. PV connector contacts are plated, commonly silver or tin over copper, and the plating's job is both to lower contact resistance and to keep the base metal out of the electrochemical picture. Where moisture arrives and the plating is thin, worn or damaged, corrosion products build at the interface. The result is a rising contact resistance and the same slow thermal feedback that follows: a joint that heats, degrades its own seal, admits more moisture and continues. Salt spray and ammonia accelerate it.

See also: Water ingressContact resistance

Hot spot (at a connection)

A localised point of high temperature at a connection, caused by elevated resistance or a reduced contact area.

A hot spot is a symptom rather than a cause, and at a PV connector it points to one of three things: contact resistance above the acceptable value, a contact area reduced by partial engagement or damage, or a connection carrying more current than it was rated for after derating. It is self-reinforcing, because elevated temperature relaxes contact force and degrades the seal, both of which raise resistance further. Because the fault is thermal, it is best found thermally: infrared inspection under load, comparing a connector against its neighbours on the same string, is the standard field method.

See also: I²R heating at the jointContact resistanceThermal cycling

On standards and editions. Standards are cited here for orientation. They are revised, and national adoption varies from the international text. Always confirm the edition in force in the jurisdiction where the array is built, and the edition your project specification actually names — an older tender may still reference a withdrawn standard, and a certificate may name a different edition than the one the specification requires.

On figures and acceptance criteria. Ratings quoted here are the values fixed by the standard or the product certificate. Values described as acceptance criteria or typical figures are industry practice used in qualification testing, not thresholds the standard itself imposes; they are labelled as such wherever they appear.

On cross-mating. A connector product standard qualifies a product in isolation. It does not make that product intermateable with a different manufacturer's product. For what the installation codes require on this point, see PV Connector Cross-Mating and Intermateability and NEC 690.33(C).

Ask a Terminology or Standards Question

If a specification uses one of these terms in a way that does not match the definition here, tell us the project and the wording. We will confirm what applies to the model you need and which document governs.

Contact the PV connector team

Send us the term, the specification it appears in, and the model you are evaluating. Our engineering team will come back with the applicable standard, the certificate reference and the datasheet.

WhatsApp: +86 186 8861 9157

Contact us →
Contact WhatsApp
CONTACT
WhatsApp Email